ABSTRACT
Patients undergoing treatment for haematological malignancies have been shown to have reduced antibody responses to vaccination against SARS-COV2. This is particularly important in patients who have undergone allogeneic haemopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), in whom there is limited data about vaccine efficacy. In this retrospective single-centre analysis, we present data on serologic responses following one, two, three or four doses of either Pfizer-BioNTech (PB), AstraZeneca (AZ) or Moderna (MU) SARS-CoV- 2 vaccines from a series of 75 patients who have undergone allogeneic HSCT within 2 years from the time they were revaccinated. The seroconversion rates following post-HSCT vaccination were found to be 50.7%, 78%, 79% and 83% following the first, second, third and fourth primary post -HSCT vaccine doses, respectively. The median time from allograft to first revaccination was 145 days (range 79-700). Our findings suggest that failure to respond to the first SARS-CoV- 2 vaccine post-HSCT was associated with the presence of acute GVHD (p = 0.042) and treatment with rituximab within 12 months of vaccination (p = 0.019). A statistical trend was observed with the presence of chronic GVHD and failure to seroconvert following the second (p = 0.07) and third (p = 0.09) post-HSCT vaccine doses. Patients who had received one or more SARS-CoV- 2 vaccines prior to having an allogeneic stem cell transplant were more likely to demonstrate a positive antibody response following the first dose of revaccination against Sars-CoV- 2 (p = 0.019) and retained this seropositivity following subsequent doses. The incidence of confirmed COVID-19 diagnosis among this cohort at the time of analysis was 16%. 17% of these were hospitalised and there was one recorded death (8%) secondary to COVID-19 in a patient who was 15.7 months post allogeneic transplant. In summary, this study suggests that despite the initial low seroconversion rates observed postallogeneic transplant, increasing levels of antibody response are seen post the second primary vaccine dose. In addition, there seems to be lower risk of mortality secondary to COVID-19 in this vaccinated population, compared to what was reported in the earlier phases of the pandemic prior to use of SARS-COV2 vaccination. This adds support to the widely adopted policy of early full revaccination with repeat of primary vaccine doses and boosters post-HSCT to reduce mortality in this population. Finally, we have identified rituximab use and active GVHD as potential risk factors influencing serological responses to SARS-COV2 vaccination and further work should focus on further characterising this risk and optimum dosing schedule both pre-and post-transplant.
ABSTRACT
Background: Tixagevimab(Txg)/cilgavimab (Cgv) was given emergency use authorization (EUA) to provide passive immunity against COVID-19(CoV) for immunocompromised (IC) pts who may not mount an adequate response to CoV vaccination [1]. Recipients of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant (Allo-HCT) are amongst the most IC. Due to high risk of mortality and complications of CoV in this population, Txg/ Cgv was used as pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) under EUA without prior study. Our study aims to assess efficacy and adverse events (AE) of Txg/Cgv administration in this cohort of patients to help guide future practice. Method(s): We retrospectively investigated Allo-HCT recipients who received Txg/Cgv as PrEP. Data were gathered including changes in blood counts, incidence of graft-vs-host-disease (GVHD), history of prior CoV infection and vaccination status. Pts who developed CoV infection after PrEP were assessed for supplemental oxygen(O2) need and hospitalization. Data cutoff date was 9/30/2022. Result(s): A total of 18 Allo-HCT recipients received Txg/Cgv. Table 1 summarizes patient and transplant characteristics. Thirteen (72.2%) pts received 2 doses of 150mg of Txg / Cgv, while 4 pts received 1 dose of 300mg, and one patient received one dose of 150mg. Median time to first dose was 213 days [range 22-3660] post-transplant. Two pts had lab confirmed CoV, one at 24 days post dosing and the 2nd patient at 22 days post dose. Neither required supplemental O2;one was hospitalized for fever. Prior to dosing, 44.4% (8/18) of pts had GVHD. (Table Presented) (Figure Presented) (Figure Presented) Of these, 62.5% (5/8) had no changes in the severity of their GVHD. Two of 8 (25%) pts with pre-existing chronic GVHD had a flare of symptoms. Two (25%) had improvement of GVHD. Two pts developed new onset acute GVHD following Txg/Cgv administration, one requiring 1mg/kg prednisone and the other topical steroids (2/18, 11%). Figure 1 summarizes GVHD patterns observed. Hematologic parameters did not change significantly, see Figure 2. None of the pts reported any subjective AE following dosing. Summary: Txg/Cgv was found to be safe and effective for Allo-HCT pts, without significant toxicity. Two patients had new onset GVHD and 2 patients had progressive GVHD. Whether there is a true association between Txg/Cgv and development of GVHD should be investigated in a larger cohort and then investigated for possible underlying mechanisms.Copyright © 2023 American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy
ABSTRACT
Background: The use of cryopreservation for stem cell grafts for both autologous stem cell and allogeneic cord blood transplant has been utilized for years. For other allogeneic stem cell transplant sources, the use of fresh collected grafts has been preferred due to concerns that cryopreservation may result in impaired graft function. With the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic a shift was made at our institution to exclusive use of cryopreservation Methods: In this retrospective single-center analysis a total of 133 patients undergoing allogeneic stem cell transplant at the University of Minnesota between 1/2018-6/2021 for a variety of malignancies were included, with 62 patients receiving fresh stem cell product and 71 patients receiving frozen stem cell product. Univariate statistical analysis was performed. Result(s): There was no significant difference between the two groups with regards to product type, sex, age, diagnosis (acute leukemia vs other), disease risk index, conditioning regimen, Karnofsky score, co-morbidity index, or cell dose (Table 1). Donor type was notably different between the two groups (p<0.01): matched sibling grafts were more commonly used for fresh products than frozen (85% vs. 35%), while matched unrelated donors were used more frequently for frozen than for fresh products (54% vs. 6%). Use of frozen product was associated with delayed neutrophil and platelet engraftment compared to fresh (median days to engraftment 15 vs 12 for neutrophils, 23 vs 17 for platelets, p<0.01 for both). Two-year relapse rates were significantly lower for frozen products (4%) than fresh (24%) (Table 2). This may be partially attributable to differences in follow up between the groups, as fresh products had a total of 910 days of follow up vs 432 for frozen products (P<0.0001). The difference in follow up remained statistically significant if the data was censored at 730 days (P<0.0001). Of note, the use of frozen products was associated with a lower rate of chronic graft-versus-host disease at one year post-transplant (p<0.01). There was no significant difference in the rates of acute GVHD between the groups. There were significant differences in GVHD prophylaxis regimens between the fresh and frozen groups (p<0.01). (Figure Presented)Two-year overall survival did not differ between groups (p=0.96). Conclusion(s): Use of cryopreserved stem cell products is associated with similar efficacy and outcomes as those seen with the use of fresh stem cell products. Although the data presented here suggest novel finding of decreased risk of relapse and chronic GVHD with the use of frozen stem cell products, additional follow up may abrogate these differences. Regardless, the logistical benefits of cryopreservation make this an attractive option for continued use in allogeneic transplants and our data presented here suggests that cryopreserved products remain an appropriate option for allogeneic stem cell transplant.Copyright © 2023 American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy
ABSTRACT
Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo- HSCT) has traditionally involves administering fresh peripheral blood or bone marrow stem cells. At onset of the COVID-19 pandemic in March 2020, the National Marrow Donor Program (NDMP) mandated cryopreservation of all unrelated peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) products to prevent interruptions in transplant plans by donor COVID-19 infection after recipient's start of conditioning chemotherapy. Since the lifting of this mandate, many centers have continued to cryopreserve grafts prior to initiation of conditioning, but the longer-term clinical outcomes of this practice including chronic graft versus host disease (cGVHD) rates of patients receiving cryopreserved stem cells have not been previously well described. Prior work has raised concern for a deleterious effect of cryopreservation on overall survival and non-relapse mortality (PMID: 33865804). However, heterogeneity in the patient population and reason for cryopreservation suggest that further study is needed to assess these outcomes. Here we report our single-institution experience of clinical outcomes using cryopreserved versus fresh URD PBSCs for allo-HSCT. We examined long-term outcomes in 387 patients who received unrelated donor (URD) PBSCs (136 cryopreserved, 251 fresh) between January 1, 2019 and July 31, 2021. The cohorts had similar baseline characteristics including donor/recipient age/sex, disease, conditioning regimen/intensity, and GVHD prophylaxis regimens. Two-year OS, PFS, relapse, NRM, and acute GVHD rates were not different between recipients of fresh versus cryopreserved PBSCs. Strikingly, 2-year incidence of cGVHD (28% vs 52%, p=0.00001) and moderate/severe cGVHD (9% vs 24%, p=0.00016) was substantially lower in recipients of cryopreserved PBSCs compared to fresh, respectively (Figure 1). This difference was only noted in patients receiving a GVHD prophylaxis regimen without post-transplantation cyclophosphamide (PTCY) (no PTCY 2-year cGVHD incidence cryopreserved vs fresh: 29% vs 57%, p=0.000016), moderate/severe cGVHD 16% vs 34%, p=0.0006) (Figure 2). For patients receiving a PTCY-containing GVHD prophylaxis regimen, there was no difference in cGVHD incidence (cGVHD cryopreserved vs fresh: 24% vs 27%, p=0.56, moderate/severe cGVHD 7% vs 9.3%, p=0.3, Figure 3). (Figure Presented) (Figure Presented) (Figure Presented) While survival and relapse rates are not different, cryopreservation is associated with a marked reduction in cGVHD rates in the setting of non-PTCy based GVHD prophylaxis. Larger multicenter or registry analyses are needed to confirm these observations and may prompt a re-assessment of the role of cryopreservation of stem cell products in clinical practice. If confirmed, it will be critical to understand the immunologic consequences of cryopreservation and how they might influence the clinical impact on chronic GVHDCopyright © 2023 American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy
ABSTRACT
The Hermanos Ameijeiras Hospital (HAH) in Havana is the only center performing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) in adult patients in Cuba. Because transplants from unrelated donors are not possible due to political restrictions and economic embargo, in 2016 HAH and University of Illinois at Chicago (UIC) started a collaboration to support the training of a physician, annual educational programs and exchange of guidelines and protocols to perform haploidentical transplants. The first haploidentical transplant was performed at HAH in 2016. Because of limited resources, disease risk stratification is based on morphologic assessment, as cytogenetic is tested on an irregular basis. Peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC) were infused based on total nucleated cell count (TNC) due to lack of reagents for flow cytometry. Posttransplant chimerism and CMV monitoring cannot be performed. Transplant activity was stopped in 2020 due to high expenses allocated for COVID19 pandemic in Cuba. From 2016 to 2020, 16 haploidentical HSCT in 15 patients (9 males/ 6 females) were completed at HAH. The median age of patients was 34 years (range:21-54). Diagnoses included: acute leukemia, n=12, myelodysplastic syndrome, n=1, Hodgkin disease, n=1, and severe aplastic anemia, n=1. At the time of transplant, 11 patients were in morphologic remission and 5 had active disease. Conditioning regimens utilized were myeloablative (Flu/Bu) in 10 cases and at reduced intensity (Flu/Cy/ TBI200 +/- ATG) in 6 cases, and GVHD prophylaxis was standard PTCy on D3 and 4, CsA and mycophenolate. The donors were mother (n=10), father (n=1), child (1), or sibling (n=3) and the median age was 48 years (range: 26-68). All patients received fresh stem cells from PBSC(n=13) or bone marrow (n=3). Median cell dose infused was 5.5x108 TNC/kg (range: 2.2-8). All patients but 1 engrafted and median time to neutrophil and platelet engraftment was 17 days (range:12-28) and 16 days (range:11-30), respectively. Acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) grade 2-3 occurred in 50% of patients and chronic GVHD in 2 out of 8 that were evaluable. Day 100 and 2-year overall survival rates were 73% and 40%, respectively. With a medium follow-up of 18.8 months (range: 0.3-64), 5 of 15 patients (30%) are alive and complete remission. Causes of death in the remaining 10 patients included relapse of original disease, n= 4;bacterial infection, n=2;brain hemorrhage, n=1;VOD, n=1;graft failure, n=1;and multi-organ failure, n=1. Despite significant difficulties, HAH implemented a haploidentical transplant program for adult patients in Cuba. Among future steps, improving access to molecular testing and using younger donors will be pursued to improve on the results. The partnership between HAH and UIC has been instrumental in building clinical and research capacity and continues to support HAH in its mission to provide care to patients in Cuba.(Figure Presented)Copyright © 2023 American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy
ABSTRACT
Background: Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) with ex vivo T cell receptor (TCR) alphabeta+ T cell and CD19+ B cell depletion is an effective approach for children with primary immune deficiency disorders (PIDD) as it combines advantages of high CD34+ cell dose facilitating rapid engraftment with low risk of Graft Versus Host Disease (GVHD). The ideal pre-conditioning regimen that facilitates robust donor engraftment without increasing risk of transplant related mortality has not been well defined with this approach. Method(s): We report the outcomes of 4 pediatric subjects: Chronic Granulomatous Disease (CGD) (2), Wiskott Aldrich Syndrome (WAS) (1), and RAC2 deficient Severe Combined Immunodeficiency (1) who underwent haploidentical HCT with TCRalphabeta+ T cell/CD19+ depletion at Johns Hopkins All Children's Hospital/Moffitt Cancer Center from 2020-2022 (NCT04414046). Pre-conditioning regimen consisted of distal thymoglobulin (7.5 mg/kg), fludarabine (175 mg/m2), thiotepa (10 mg/kg) and pharmacokinetic guided busulfan targeting a cumulative area under curve (cAUC) (65-75 mgxhr/L). Rituximab (200 mg/m2) was administered on day +1. Result(s): The median age at HCT was 51 months (range 10-163 months). All patients received mobilized peripheral blood stem cells from HLA- haploidentical donors (paternal=1, maternal=1 sibling=2). Median busulfan cAUC for all patients was 69 mgxhr/L (range 65-76). Median CD34 and TCR alphabeta T cell dose was 9.13x106 cells/kg (range 7.0-18.9x106) and 0.7x105 cells/kg (range 0.09-1.0x105). Median times to neutrophil and platelet engraftment were 11 days (9-12) and 11 days (range 8-15), respectively. All 4 patients are alive with median follow-up of 19.5 months (range 7-24). One patient developed late VOD without organ dysfunction that resolved with defibrotide. At last follow up, peripheral T and myeloid chimerisms exceeded 90% in all 4 patients. Average time to CD4 recovery (> 200x106/L) was 142 days. Pre-existing inflammatory bowel disease in CGD (n=1) and WAS (n=1) patients resolved immediately following transplant. There was no graft failure, and none developed Grade III-IV acute or extensive chronic GVHD. Patient with WAS developed recurrent autoimmune cytopenias requiring corticosteroids, rituximab, sirolimus and daratumumab, and ultimately resolved. Viral reactivations included EBV (n= 1), adeno (n= 1), HHV6 (n= 2), BK (n=1), norovirus (n=1), and late HSV (n=1), all responded to antivirals without disease. All patients acquired SARS-Cov-2 after transplant and recovered without sequelae. Conclusion(s): TCR alphabeta+ and CD19+ depleted haploidentical transplantation using a reduced toxicity conditioning regimen with pharmacokinetic guided busulfan, fludarabine, thiotepa and thymoglobulin is well-tolerated in young children with PIDD that results in rapid, durable engraftment with low likelihood of GVHD and graft rejection.Copyright © 2023 American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy
ABSTRACT
The World Health Organization (WHO) declared COVID-19 a pandemic in March 2020. Since then, logistical challenges arose regarding the procurement of allogeneic (allo) hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) donor grafts. Little data was available on transplant outcomes using cryo haploidentical (haplo) HSC grafts with post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy) for GVHD prophylaxis. We retrospectively analyzed patients who received a first PTCy-based haplo hematopoietic stem cell transplant (Haplo HCT) at a single outpatient transplant center between January 2015 and December 2021. We identified 294 patients, 179 received a fresh graft and 115 received a cryo graft (Table 1). Both cohorts were similar in terms of median age, diagnoses, HCT-CI score and DRI. Out of 179 fresh haplo grafts, 160 (89.4%) were from peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC) and 19 (10.6%) were bone marrow grafts (BM). There were no cryo BM grafts used. Conditioning intensity were similar amongst both cohorts, with 43% myeloablative, 41.9% non-myeloablative and 15.1% RIC regimens used for fresh Haplo HCT and 39.1% myeloablative, 42.6% non-myeloablative and 18.3% RIC cryo Haplo HCT. Median time to engraftment was 16 days for fresh Haplo HCT and 17 days for cryo HCT (p=0.18). Median time to platelet engraftment was 27 days for fresh Haplo HCT and 27.5 days for cryo HCT (p=0.96). Since March 2020, only 8 transplants performed at our institution were from fresh haplo HSC grafts. Cryo grafts performed after March 2020 accounted for 73 (63.5%) of 115 total cryo Haplo HCT performed in the period reviewed. Using a Cox model to evaluate the effect of graft type and adjusting for significant variables, we found no difference in overall survival (OS), disease free survival (DFS), non-relapse mortality (NRM) and relapse rates between fresh and cryo Haplo HCT performed (Figure 1). While we found no difference in grades III-IV aGVHD (Table Presented) (Figure Presented) between fresh vs cryo Haplo HCT, we found a statistically significant higher incidence of grades II-IV aGVHD (p=0.033). There was no difference in all-grade cGVHD (p=0.53) or moderate- severe cGVHD (p=0.86) (Figure 2).(Figure Presented) The National Marrow Donor Program (NMDP) released a statement requiring cryopreservation of unrelated donor grafts at the start of the COVID-19 pandemic. The cryopreservation of all types of allo HSC grafts has been adopted by many transplant programs including ours. Our results mimic a CIBMTR analysis published at the start of the pandemic, where survival outcomes using fresh vs cryo haplo HSC grafts with PTCy as GVHD prophylaxis were similar. Contrary to other reports, we did not see differences in graft failure or rates of cGVHD between fresh and cryo Haplo HCT. The use of cryopreserved HSC grafts for Haplo HCT with PTCy results in favorable outcomes in an outpatient transplant setting. Further studies are needed to determine the cost-effectiveness of this practice in the post-pandemic era.Copyright © 2023 American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy
ABSTRACT
Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) recipients are at risk of various complications during post-transplantation follow-up. Some patients may refer to an emergency department (ED) for medical attention, but data on ED visits by HSCT recipients are lacking. In the present study, we aimed to assess ED utilization in HSCT recipients and associated risk factors during post-transplantation follow-up, identify subgroups of HSCT recipients presenting to the ED, analyze outcomes and prognostic factors for hospitalization and 30-day mortality after ED visits, and assess mortality hazard following an ED presentation. The study involved a retrospective single-center longitudinal analysis including 557 consecutive recipients of allogeneic HSCT at the Medical University of Vienna, Austria, between January 2010 and January 2020. Descriptive statistics, event estimates accounting for censored data with competing risks, latent class analysis, and multivariate regression models were used for data analysis. Out of 557 patients (median age at HSCT, 49 years [interquartile range (IQR), 39 to 58 years]; 233 females and 324 males), 137 (25%) presented to our center's ED at least once during post-HSCT follow-up (median individual follow-up, 2.66 years; IQR, .72 to 5.59 years). Cumulative incidence estimates of a first ED visit in the overall cohort were 19% at 2 years post-HSCT, 25% at 5 years post-HSCT, and 28% at 10 years post-HSCT. These estimates were increased to 34%, 41%, and 43%, respectively, in patients residing in Vienna. Chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) was the sole risk factor showing a statistically significant association with ED presentation in multivariate analysis (hazard ratio [HR], 2.34; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.63 to 3.35). Patients presented to the ED with various and often multiple symptoms. We identified 3 latent patient groups in the ED, characterized mainly by the time from HSCT, chronic GVHD, and documented pulmonary infection. Hospitalization was required in 132 of all 216 analyzed ED visits (61%); in-hospital mortality and 30-day mortality rates were 13% and 7%, respectively. Active acute GVHD, systemic steroids, documented infection, pulmonary infiltrates, and oxygen supplementation were statistically significant predictors of hospitalization; shorter time from HSCT, pulmonary infiltrates, and hemodynamic instability were independent risk factors for 30-day mortality. ED presentation during the last 30 days increased the mortality hazard in the overall cohort (HR, 4.56; 95% CI, 2.68 to 7.76) after adjustment for relevant confounders. One-quarter of the patients visited the ED for medical attention at least once during post-HSCT follow-up. Depending on the presence of identified risk factors, a significant proportion of patients may require hospitalization and be at risk for adverse outcomes. Screening for these risk factors and specialist consultation should be part of managing most HSCT recipients presenting to the ED.
Subject(s)
Graft vs Host Disease , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation , Male , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Transplantation, Homologous/adverse effects , Graft vs Host Disease/epidemiology , Graft vs Host Disease/etiology , Risk Factors , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation/adverse effectsABSTRACT
Graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) is common after haematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). Mucocutaneous manifestations are variable and may simulate autoimmune bullous dermatoses. However, the association of GvHD with autoimmune disorders, including bullous dermatoses, is also well recognized. We describe a patient with GvHD in whom severe and relapsing epidermolysis bullosa acquisita (EBA) was diagnosed 3 years after transplant and propose a causal association with GvHD. A 66-year-old woman developed GvHD following allogeneic HCT for acute myeloid leukaemia in 2016. This affected her gastrointestinal tract and skin but improved with oral corticosteroids and ciclosporin. In 2019 she presented with a widespread rash consisting of large, tense, haemorrhagic blisters. Histological features were in keeping with EBA. Direct immunofluorescence was also consistent with EBA, demonstrating linear positivity for IgG and C3 confined to the blister base, as was detection of collagen VII antibodies on indirect immunofluorescence. She was admitted and treated with high-dose oral steroids, ciclosporin and intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) with eventual resolution of blistering. Although further IVIg administration was planned as an outpatient, this coincided with the start of the COVID-19 pandemic and she elected not to attend and also stopped all medication. Despite this, her EBA remained quiescent until September 2021 when she was readmitted with a severe deterioration in blistering and significant dysphagia due to an oesophageal stricture, with a weight of 31.7 kg. Once again, she responded rapidly to oral prednisolone and IVIg. Dapsone was considered but precluded by G6PD deficiency and there were clinical and adherence concerns about using mycophenolate mofetil. Upon discharge she was again nonadherent to medication and failed to attend for planned IVIg. She flared and was admitted for a third time in December 2021, requiring gastrostomy for nutritional support;her weight at this time was 26.4 kg. Her EBA is currently well controlled on prednisolone and IVIg. EBA is a rare, acquired blistering disorder secondary to autoantibodies targeting type VII collagen. Previous studies have found circulating basement membrane zone (BMZ) antibodies in 24% of chronic GvHD patients, possibly generated in response to chronic BMZ damage (Hofmann SC, Kopp G, Gall C et al. Basement membrane antibodies in sera of haematopoietic cell recipients are associated with graft-versushost disease. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2010;24: 587-94). Corresponding clinical manifestations are rare, with bullous pemphigoid the most frequently reported. EBA is much less common with four previously reported cases [Brassat S, Fleury J, Camus M, et al. (Epidermolysa bullosa acquisita and graftversus- host disease). Ann Dermatol Venereol 2014;141: 369-73 (in French)]. As a fifth case of EBA, our patient provides further evidence of a likely pathophysiological relationship between GvHD and autoimmune subepidermal bullous dermatoses, and highlights the significant challenges of managing these vulnerable patient groups during the COVID-19 pandemic.
ABSTRACT
Background Graft versus host disease (GVHD) most often occurs 100-365 days after hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT). Manifestations most often are dermatologic, hepatic or pulmonic, and are rarely cardiac. We present a unique case of GVHD inducing cardiogenic shock necessitating advanced heart failure therapies. Case This is a 34 year-old male with a history of acute lymphoblastic leukemia who completed chemoradiation and HSCT from an HLA perfect sibling in 1992. In May 2020, he presented with dyspnea for 6 weeks. An echocardiogram at that time showed an EF of 10% and severe biventricular dilatation. He was originally hospitalized at an outside institution for hypoxia where a left heart catheterization showed normal coronaries and goal directed therapy was initiated. After 2 negative COVID tests, he was discharged with a LifeVest. One month later, despite medication compliance, he returned in cardiogenic shock after his LifeVest was activated for ventricular tachycardia (VT). Decision-making He was started on inotropic therapy and an intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) was placed 1:1 prior to transfer to our tertiary center. After support was started, a right heart catheterization showed a right atrial pressure of 13 mmHg, a wedge of 17, and a cardiac index of 2.6. His course was complicated by VT storm. Differentials for his non-ischemic cardiomyopathy (NICMO) included myocarditis (viral vs. giant cell) with a possible component of chemotherapy/radiation induced NICMO. Immediate AHFT work-up was started. He was unable to be weaned off his IABP or inotropic support. The decision was made to pursue emergent left ventricular assist device placement (LVAD) and achieve a definitive diagnosis with a core biopsy. Pathology resulted with myocyte hypertrophy, chronic inflammation with eosinophils concerning for chronic GVHD. Conclusion There have only been a handful of case reports describing cardiac manifestations of GVHD, and none with NICMO and cardiogenic shock requiring an LVAD. Despite this, suspicion should remain present for GVHD in HSCT patients regardless of time frame from oncologic therapies or specificity of HLA match when presenting in cardiogenic shock.Copyright © 2023 American College of Cardiology Foundation
ABSTRACT
Background: Patients with hematologic conditions have a high mortality rate when infected with SARS-CoV-2 (Williamson, Nature 2020). Protection of this group from severe COVID-19 is therefore important. However, according to available vaccination guidelines, one should consider to postpone vaccination of patients on or early after chemotherapy, hematopoietic progenitor cell transplantation (HCT) or with graft versus host disease, because of anticipated poor efficacy. Based on previous (non-COVID-19) vaccination studies among hematology patients, we hypothesized that a significant group of patients may acquire sufficient protection following COVID-19 vaccination, despite disease and therapy related immunodeficiencies. Methods: We conducted a prospective cohort study with 17 cohorts of hematology patients of particular risk for severe COVID-19 who are considered to have no or limited benefit from vaccination. We evaluated humoral immune responses following 2 doses (28 days apart) of the mRNA-1273 vaccine (Moderna/Spikevax) in 722 patients, at baseline and 28 days after each vaccination as SARS-COV-2 S1- (spike)-specific serum IgG antibody concentrations by bead-based multiplex immune assay. The threshold for adequate antibody response is set at ≥300 binding antibody units (BAU)/ml according to the international WHO standard, and is associated with virus plaque reducing neutralization test titers of ≥40 PRNT 50. This study is registered as EudraCT 2021-001072-41, NL76768.029.21. Results: Patient cohorts and corresponding vaccine responses are depicted in Table 1. Vaccine efficacy, as measured by antibody concentration, 4 weeks after the 2nd mRNA-1273 vaccination was available for 691 out of 722 participants. The majority of patients (389/691;56%) obtained an S1 antibody titer that is considered adequate (≥300 BAU/ml). Twenty-nine percent of patients (198/691) did not seroconvert (S1 antibody titer <10 BAU/ml), while the remaining 15% (104/691) did seroconvert but not to sufficient levels (10-300 BAU/ml). Adequate responses were observed in the majority of patients with sickle cell disease using hydroxyurea, chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) receiving tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy, acute myeloid leukemia (AML) on or early after high dose chemotherapy, patients with myeloproliferative disorders on ruxolitinib, patients with multiple myeloma (MM), including those on daratumumab and those early after high-dose melphalan and autologous HCT, patients with untreated chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), and patients with chronic GvHD. Insufficient or absent antibody responses were observed in the majority of AML patients receiving hypomethylating agents, CLL patients on ibrutinib, patients with B-cell non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma (NHL) during or shortly after rituximab-chemotherapy or following BEAM chemotherapy and autologous HCT, allogeneic HCT recipients <6 months after transplantation, and CAR-T cell therapy recipients. However, even in these low-responder groups considerable numbers of patients did mount sufficient antibody titers. In others, titers increased after each of both vaccinations, suggesting that booster vaccination may enhance antibody titers to sufficient levels (Figure 1). Conclusion: Vaccination with mRNA-1273 had significant efficacy in severely immunocompromised hematology patients. Adequate humoral immune responses after two dose vaccination were reached in the majority of patients receiving therapy for sickle cell disease, MPD, MM, CML and AML, in patients early after HCT and in patients with GvHD. We are currently evaluating clinical and immunologic parameters that correlate with sufficient antibody responses, pseudovirus neutralization and SARS-COV-2-specific B and T cell numbers, phenotype and function. Per study design, all participants with absent or insufficient antibody responses (<300 BAU/ml) will receive a booster vaccination 5 months after initial vaccination, and antibody responses to booster vaccinations will be presented as well. Unlike currently available guidelines, COVID-19 vaccination should not be postponed. Moreover, as antibody titers increased after each of both vaccinations, booster vaccination of patients with absent or insufficient antibody responses seems warranted. (Figure Presented) .
ABSTRACT
Introduction: The use of high-dose post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCY) has revolutionized graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis and allowed to successfully reconsider haplotransplant in recent years. As this strategy significantly reduces the incidence of both acute and chronic GVHD, PTCY has been thereafter considered not only in matched settings but also as sole GVHD prophylaxis, at least when considering myeloablative allotransplant using matched sibling (MSD) or unrelated (MUD) donors and bone marrow as source of graft. Here, PTCY, as a sole GVHD prophylaxis, was tested in a reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) setting, using peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC) as source of graft considering that this platform is currently broadly used worldwide in adults. Methods: This prospective monocentric phase 2 study was designed with the main objective to demonstrate the feasibility and safety of using only PTCY (without cyclosporine A nor mycophenolate mofetyl after transplant) in adults (18-70 years old) eligible for a RIC PBSC transplant with MSD or MUD. The Baltimore platform with 2 days of PTCY 50mg/kg/day on days 3 and 4 post infusion was considered as conditioning regimen, using fludarabine for lymphoid disease or clofarabine for myeloid disease. The primary objective was to appreciate the incidence of corticosteroid-resistant acute grade 3-4 GVHD (CR 3-4 GVHD) within 100 days post-transplant. According to statistical rules, patients have to be included in a step by step fashion (3, 3, 6, 15, 15 and 17 patients) for a total of 59 evaluable patients (meaning having received PTCY), in order to stop the protocol soon enough in case of excessive rate of deleterious severe acute GVHD (graded according to Mount Sinai International Consortium). Thus, the trial had to be stopped in case of documentation of > 2 CR 3-4 GVHD for the first 3 patients, >3 CR 3-4 GVHD for the first 6 patients, > 4 CR 3-4 GVHD for the first 12 patients, > 6 3-4 CR GVHD for the first 27 patients, > 8 CR 3-4 GVHD for the first 42 patients and finally as soon as > 9 CR 3-4 GVHD for the last included patients. All patients gave informed consent. The trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03263767. Results: The results of the first 27 first patients (males n=17 and female n=10;median age: 59 years old (yo), range: 26-70) are reported here. They were included between February 2018 and November 2020. Diagnoses were AML (N=8), MDS (N=5), CMML (N=2), myelofibrosis (N=5), CML (N=1), DLBCL (N=1), T-cell lymphoma (N=1), Philadelphia positive B-ALL (N=1), CLL (N=1), lymphoblastic lymphoma (N=1) and mixed phenotype acute leukemia (N=1). Donors were MSD in 10 cases and MUD in 17. Only one primary graft failure was documented in a 61 yo MDS patient with active disease at transplant. He is however still alive in response after autologous reconstitution. With a median follow-up of 17.6 months (range: 10-42) for alive patients at the time of analysis (July 2021), 1-year and 2-year survivals were 80.9+7% and 74.7+9%, respectively, for both OS et DFS. GVHD-free/relapse-free survival (GRFS) at 1-year and 2-year was 58.7+9% and 52.2+10%, respectively. Three relapses (11%) and 6 deaths occurred. Deaths were due to acute GVHD in 4 patients (including 1 with sepsis and 1 with SARS-COVID 19 infection) and relapse in 2. Grade 2, 3 and 4 acute GVHD occurred in 11, 1 and 4 patients, respectively, for a total of 59% of grade 2-4 acute GVHD. CR 3-4 GVHD was observed in all of 5 patients with acute grade 3-4 GVHD and 4 died related to GVHD. Moderate/severe chronic GVHD occurred in 5/22 (22.7%) evaluable patients, including 4 still on immunosuppressive therapy at 40, 28, 25 and 16 months post-transplant. Overall non-relapse mortality (NRM) was 14.8% and related to acute GVHD. However, the number of cases conducting to stop the protocol was not reached. Conclusion: PTCY as a sole GVHD prophylaxis is here demonstrated as possible and relatively safe for adults receiving a matched PBSC Baltimore-based RIC allograft. The very good survivals reported he e may be related to a strong GVL effect associated with the high incidence of acute GVHD. However, because of this high incidence and the fact that NRM was related to GVHD after this first analysis, we have now made an amendment to test the addition to PTCY of one day of anti-thymoglobulin (ATG) 2.5 mg/kg on day-2 for the next 32 patients to be included. This second cohort receiving PTCY+ATG as a sole prophylaxis is ongoing.
ABSTRACT
Background. Most individuals diagnosed with mild to moderate COVID-19 are no longer infectious after day 10 of symptom onset and those with severe or critical illness from COVID are typically not infection after day 20 day of symptom onset. Recovered persons can continue to test positive for SARS-CoV-2 by PCR via detection of non-viable RNA in nasopharyngeal specimens for up to three months (or longer) after illness onset. It is also know known that severely immunocompromised patients may produce replication-competent virus greater than 20 days from symptom onset and may require, per CDC recommendations, "additional testing and consultation with infectious diseases specialists and infection control experts". We aim to discuss four case studies of severely immunocompromised patients who exhibited signs of persistent COVID-19 infection of COVID and how we managed transmission-based precautions in our hospital through sequencing and evaluation of cycle thresholds (CT) values and subgenomic RNA detection. Methods. Residual nasopharyngeal (NP) samples were collected on patients exhibiting persistent COVID like symptoms. These samples underwent N gene and N gene subgenomic RNA (sgRNA) real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (rRT-PCR) testing. Results. Analysis of longitudinal SARS-CoV-2 sequence data demonstrated within-patient virus evolution, including mutations in the receptor binding domain and deletions in the N-terminal domain of the spike protein, which have been implicated in antibody escape. See Figures 1 and 2. Figure 1. Timelines of Identified Patients 1 and 2 Patient 1: 46-year-old woman with recently diagnosed stage IV diffuse large B-cell lymphoma for which she was treated with 2 cycles of R-CHOP. Patient 2: 38-year-old woman with history of myelodysplastic syndrome, peripheral blood stem cell transplant with chronic graft versus host disease of the GI tract, skin, and eyes as well as CMV enteritis, and she was maintained on rituximab, mycophenolate mofetil, prednisone, and monthly IVIG without recent changes to her immunosuppression. Figure 2. Timeline of Identified Patients 3 and 4 Patient 3: 44 year-old man with prior history of thymoma s/p thymectomy Patient 4: 46 year-old man who was initially diagnosed with marginal zone lymphoma approximately 2.5 years ago. He was initially treated with bendamustine and rituximab and achieved remission. He was then continued on maintenance rituximab without significant complications for a planned two years. Conclusion. Differentiating between prolonged viral shedding of non-infectious RNA and persistent replicating viable virus can be difficult to determine without full evaluation of a patient's clinical picture and timeline. Consultation between laboratory, infectious diseases, and infection prevention experts to provide appropriate level of guidance for precautions and treatment may be warranted. Testing by PCR and analysis of CT values may provide key findings of viral replication in immunocompromised hosts, indicating the need for evaluation of additional treatment and maintaining isolation status in healthcare settings.
ABSTRACT
Introduction: Randomized trials demonstrated ~95% efficacy of SARS-CoV-2 spike messenger RNA (mRNA) vaccines. Patients (pts) after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) have a variable period of immune deficiency and the impact of diagnosis, treatment regimens, GvHD, and immunosuppression on vaccine (vacc) immunogenicity is unknown. Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of 149 consecutive pts (Table) who received a SARS-CoV-2 vacc between 12/17/2020, and 5/21/21, and were tested for anti-SARS-CoV-2 S1/S2 antibodies. Serology testing was performed with the Liaison® SARS-CoV-2 S1/S2 IgG assay (DiaSorin) with ≥15 AU/mL defined as a positive result. Pts with prior COVID-19 infection were excluded. Pts received mRNA-1273/Moderna (n= 46), BNT162b2/Pfizer-BioNTech (n= 100) or Jannsen vacc (n= 3). Reactogenicity was not investigated. Demographic and treatment variables were tested for prediction of vaccine response using Chi-square test or Fisher's exact test for categorical variables and two-sample t test for continuous variables. Univariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses with backward selection using Akaike information criterion (AIC) were used to examine interdependence of those variables and odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Results: Pts underwent HCT from a related HLA matched sibling (n=36), related haploidentical (n= 23), or matched/mismatched unrelated donor (n= 89). 93% received fludarabine in the HCT conditioning regimen (data not shown). All pts received a calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) and 76 pts received ATG for GvHD prophylaxis. All pts achieved at least mixed donor lymphoid engraftment (data not shown). Median time from HCT to 1st vaccination was 26 months (range, 3-258 months). Median age at time of vaccination was 61 years (range, 24-78) and 75 (50%) were female. Serology was tested at a median of 37 days (range, 6-119 days) after the second vacc dose. Serology was tested <14 days in 3 pts;all were seropositive. No pt developed COVID-19 during the period of observation. 101 pts (67%) tested positive for anti-SARS-CoV-2 S1/S2 antibodies (vacc responders). Of the responders, the median time from HCT to 1st vacc was 45.5 months (range, 3-258, SD 39.78). Among the 23 pts between 3-9 months after HCT, 26% (n=6) had a positive antibody response, but all were receiving ongoing immunosuppression at time of vaccination. 29% (n=29) vacc responders were receiving prednisone (pred) in the management of cGvHD at the time of vaccination. 48 pts did not mount an antibody response (vacc non-responders). Of the non-responders, 30 pts were receiving cGvHD treatment at the time of vacc, 31 pts were taking pred, and 20 pts were taking CNIs. In univariate analysis, we found a history of prolonged use of pred (>8 weeks) and/or CNIs, on current treatment for cGvHD at time of vacc, and receipt of rituximab in the preceding 12 months predicted for lack of response (Table). Active use of pred and treatment with pred >8 weeks in the preceding 12 months prior to vacc predicted vacc non-response [OR 0.221;95% CI (0.106 - 0.456);p<0.001] and [OR 0.408;95% CI (0.197 - 0.844);p=0.016] in univariate analysis, respectively, however, active use of pred was predictive [OR 0.07;95% CI (0.016-0.304;p<0.001] while pred treatment >8 weeks was not [OR 2.00;95% CI (0.55-7.298;p=0.293] in multivariable analysis. Other significant predictors for non-response in the multivariable analysis include pt use of ruxolitinib [OR, 0.233, 95% CI, (0.067-0.808);p=0.022], and rituximab within 1 year [OR, 0.026, 95% CI, (0.007-0.099);p<0.001]. Discussion: In this study, we found that 67% allogeneic HCT pts developed anti-SARS-CoV-2 S1/S2 antibodies after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination. Predictors of non-response after adjustment for potential confounders, were factors that are expected to suppress immune response including active use of immunosuppressive medications. Consistent with prior studies, anti-CD20 therapy likely impairs humoral response to vaccination. Ruxolitinib also appears to impair response. owever, a proportion of pts being actively treated for cGvHD responded to vaccination and these pts should still be encouraged to receive vaccination in consideration of the COVID-19 mortality risk. Many questions remain including the protective benefit of immune response, the duration of response, and the potential value of booster vaccinations in non-responders. [Formula presented] Disclosures: Rowley: ReAlta Life Sciences: Consultancy.
ABSTRACT
Introduction COVID-19 is usually a mild disease in immunocompetent children, with ~1% requiring intensive care unit (ICU) admission and <0.1% mortality. Data on its course in children following hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) is limited. Methods Data on children following HCT who developed COVID-19 (diagnosed by positive SARS-CoV-2 PCR on respiratory tract samples) during 3.2020-4.2021 were prospectively collected by EBMT and GETH, including demography, HCT data, COVID-related manifestations, ICU admission and mortality. Factors associated with worse outcomes (ICU admission or mortality) were characterized. Results Sixty-two children (34 boys;median age 9;min-max;0.7-17 years) were reported from 27 centers, 16 countries;57 (92%) following allogeneic and 5 (8%) following autologous HCT. Underlying diseases were acute leukemia (23;37%), inherited disorders (9;15%), hemoglobinopathies (7;11%), solid tumor (6;10%), bone marrow failure (5;8%), other malignant (8;13%) and non-malignant (4;6%) diseases. Five (8%) children had high blood pressure;6 (10%) had underlying lung pathology. The median time from the most recent HCT to COVID was 5 months (min-max;0-169). The stem cell source was bone marrow (33);peripheral (22) or cord blood (1). Among the patients with information available, 34 (62%) underwent in-vivo T cell depletion, 20 (33%) received corticosteroids, and 36 (60%) other immunosuppressant drugs(s) within two months prior to and after the COVID-19 episode. The presence of acute grade 2-4 or chronic graft versus host disease (GVHD) was reported in 12/54 (23%) and 8/51 (16%) children, respectively. Clinical presentation (n=57) included fever (28;49%), cough (18;32%), diarrhea (8;14%), upper respiratory tract disease (as rhinorrhea, sinusitis, otitis, or pharyngitis;12;21%);six (10%) required oxygen to maintain oxygen saturation above 92%;20 children (35%) were asymptomatic. The median time from symptoms onset to COVID diagnosis was 1 day (-43-40). Sixty-three percent of patients were hospitalized;43% due to COVID. The proportion of children with neutropenia or lymphocytopenia (<500 cells/mm 3) was 75% and 73%, respectively. Sixteen children (26%) had evidence of viral (n=10), bacterial (n=6) or fungal (n=2) coinfections. The median time from COVID diagnosis to the last follow-up in alive patients was 69 days (min-max;2 - 294). Six (10%) children who developed COVID at a median 6.5 (min-max;2- 16) months following allo-HCT (median age 6 years;5 boys) required ICU care within a median 6 (min-max;-5-15) days after diagnosis. All of them were neutropenic, received steroids, and other immunosuppressive drugs at COVID diagnosis;5 had undergone in-vivo T cell depletion;5 were lymphocytopenic, 5 had GVHD (2 acute and 3 chronic);3 received non-invasive and 2 invasive ventilation. Three children had viral or bacterial coinfections. Three children died. Six (10%) children (5 boys, median age 10.5 years;min-max;4-13) who developed COVID at median 2 (min-max;0-147) months following allo-HCT died within median 35 days (min-max;5-54) after diagnosis. One had high blood pressure, and none suffered from underlying lung pathology. At the time of COVID, 3 were neutropenic, 2 lymphocytopenic;4 had GVHD (2 acute, 2 chronic);3 received steroids and 4 immunosuppressive drugs. Two had viral or bacterial coinfections. Five had positive SARS-CoV-2 PCR at the time of death. In 3, COVID was the primary cause of death. We compared nine children with the worse outcomes to 53 children with benign course. Among patients alive at 100-day post HCT, the probability of worse outcomes was higher in patients with vs. without chronic GVHD (Figure). No other significant differences were observed in demographic, underlying disease, and HCT-related characteristics. Compared to adults following HCT (Ljungman, Leukemia 2021), children had: - Shorter median time from HCT to COVID diagnosis, 5 vs 18 months;- Higher proportion of asymptomatic infections, 35% vs 9%;- Lower proportion of those who required oxygen, 10% vs 35%;- Lower all-cause mortality, 10% vs 29%. Conclusions Children following HCT with COVID-19 have a higher risk of ICU admission and mortality compared to immune competent children. The presence of chronic GVHD at COVID diagnosis was associated with worse outcomes. COVID course following HCT is milder in children compared to adults. [Formula presented] Disclosures: Averbuch: Takeda: Consultancy;Pfizer: Consultancy;GSK: Speakers Bureau. De La Camara: Roche: Consultancy;IQONE: Consultancy. Corbacioglu: Gentium/Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Honoraria. Mikulska: Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau;Gilead: Speakers Bureau;MSD: Speakers Bureau;Janssen: Speakers Bureau;Biotest: Speakers Bureau. Kulagin: Roche: Speakers Bureau;Sanofi: Speakers Bureau;Generium: Speakers Bureau;Biocad: Research Funding;Apellis: Research Funding;Alexion: Research Funding;X4 Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding;Novartis: Speakers Bureau;Johnson & Johnson: Speakers Bureau;Pfizer: Speakers Bureau. Cesaro: Sobi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees;Gilead: Speakers Bureau. Lawson: Alexion: Honoraria. Kroeger: Neovii: Honoraria, Research Funding;Sanofi: Honoraria;Jazz: Honoraria, Research Funding;Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding;Riemser: Honoraria, Research Funding;Gilead/Kite: Honoraria;AOP Pharma: Honoraria;Novartis: Honoraria. Styczynski: MSD, Pfizer, Giled, TEVA, Jazz, Novartis: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Ljungman: Takeda: Consultancy, Other: Endpoint committee, speaker;Enanta: Other: DSMB;Janssen: Other: Investigator;OctaPharma: Other: DSMB;Merck: Other: Investigator, speaker;AiCuris: Consultancy.
ABSTRACT
Four decades ago, Hal Broxmeyer demonstrated that umbilical cord blood (CB) contained hematopoietic stem cells (HSC) and hypothesized that CB could be used as a source of donor HSC for rescue of myeloablated bone marrow. In 1988, Gluckman et al reported the first successful cord blood transplant (CBT) of a child with Fanconi Anemia using matched sibling CB. This patient survives and 35 years later still has durable hematopoiesis from the CB donor graft. In 1991, Rubinstein et al established an unrelated donor (UD) CB bank and in 1993 the first UD CBT was using a unit from this bank. Since that time, >40,000 CBTs have been performed worldwide. We hypothesized that changes in cord blood banking (increased size, diversity, and quality of banked units enabling selection of units with higher cell doses and closer HLA matching) and in transplantation (less use of steroids, availability of newer therapies for prophylaxis and treatment of graft versus host disease [GVHD], improved antifungal and antiviral detection and therapeutics) have improved outcomes of CBT today. To address this hypothesis, we performed a retrospective study combining data from Eurocord and Duke University in a large cohort of children transplanted with a single UD CB unit (CBU) from 1993-2019. Standard transplant outcomes (overall survival [OS], disease free survival [DFS], acute and chronic GVHD, treatment related mortality [TRM], and relapse) and changes in outcomes over 3 time periods (1:<2005, n=1297;2:2005-2010, n=1735;and 3:>2010, n=1802) were studied. Relative contributions of cell dose and HLA matching to transplant outcomes over time were assessed. A total of 4834 patients (4015 from Eurocord and 819 from Duke) were analyzed. The majority of patients, (59%, n=2839) had malignant diagnoses including 1422 with ALL, 887 with AML and 167 with MDS. Of the 1995 with non-malignant diagnoses, 761 had inborn errors of metabolism, 644 had primary immunodeficiency, 325 had a bone marrow failure syndrome and 206 had a histiocytic disorder. Half of the patients had positive serologies for CMV prior to transplant. The median age of the cohort fell from 5.2 to 3.25 years over time. In patients with malignancies, use of total body irradiation decreased over time. The median total nucleated cell (TNC) and CD34+ cell doses administered were 8.07x10e7 and 6.17x10e5 cells/kg and increased over time. HLA matching and transplantation of patients in earlier disease states also increased over time, p<0.001 for both. The probability of 5-year OS in the entire cohort was 53.48% and improved over time: 42%;57.4%;and 60.4%, in periods 1,2,3 respectively (p<0.0001). OS improved with closer HLA matching, higher cell dose, myeloablative conditioning, and negative pre-transplant CMV serologies. For patients with malignancies, DFS increased and TRM and acute GVHD decreased over time. In contrast, leukemic relapse did not change throughout the years. OS was higher in patients with inborn errors of metabolism and also improved over time with 57.8% surviving before 2005, 69.4% from 2005-2010, and 71% after 2010 (p=0.0141). Similar results were seen in the cohort with immune deficiencies. In the entire cohort, the median time to neutrophil engraftment decreased from 25 days (period 1) to 19 days (period 3). In multivariate analysis for engraftment, a higher TNC dose (p=0.001) up to but not beyond the median cell dose (8.07x10e7 cells/kg), total body irradiation, and the use of ATG improved engraftment. Acute GVHD decreased from 35% before 2005 to 27.1% after 2010 (p=0.0556) while the incidence of chronic GvHD was stable. The use of ATG reduced the risk of acute GVHD and closer HLA matching reduced the risk of both acute and chronic GVHD. In this population of patients receiving high cell doses, outcomes were predominantly influenced by HLA matching and increasing cell dose did not abrogate HLA mismatching. In conclusion, we analyzed the largest cohort of pediatric patients undergoing CBT over the past 3 decades. OS, DFS and engraftment have improved over time accompanied b decreases in TRM and acute GVHD. Relapse and chronic GVHD were stable and remain low. These improvements are explained by the increased availability of high quality banked CBUs enabling selection of closer HLA matching and units with higher cell doses. The numbers of CBTs have decreased in the past decade, but these results support the ongoing use of CBT in children lacking matched related or unrelated donors. [Formula presented] Disclosures: Kurtzberg: Neurogene: Consultancy;CryoCell: Patents & Royalties: Duke licensed IP, and data and regulatory packages for manufacturing and use of cord blood and cord tissue MSCs in the treatment of patients with hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy, cerebral palsy, autism, acute ischemic stroke, COVID-ARDS, and COVID-MIS-C.;Sinocell: Patents & Royalties: Duke licensed IP, data, and regulatory packages for use of autologous and sibling cord blood to treat children with cerebral palsy.;Celularity: Current holder of stock options in a privately-held company. Troy: SinoCell: Patents & Royalties;CryoCell: Patents & Royalties;Bristol Myers Squibb: Research Funding;Synthetic Biologics: Honoraria;Gamida Cell: Consultancy;The EMMES Corporation: Consultancy;The Community Data Roundtable: Consultancy;AegisCN: Consultancy.
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant (allo-HCT) exists as a potential cure to a number of different benign and malignant hematologic conditions. About 50% of patient develop cGVHD, the most important long-term complication of allo-HCT with profound effects on immune recovery. This immunocompromised patient population requires careful consideration regarding approach to vaccination. As the SARS-CoV-2 vaccines were developed and made available at an unprecedented rate, we are learning in real-time how specific vulnerable patient populations are affected, particularly as patients with cGVHD were largely excluded from clinical trials for the SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccines. Though the immunomodulatory mechanisms of the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines are poorly understood, societies such as ASH and ASTCT recommend that patients with cGVHD receive it. Here, we report our experience in patients with cGVHD who received the mRNA SARS-CoV-2 vaccine. METHODS: We performed this retrospective analysis of all Huntsman Comprehensive Cancer Center patients who underwent allo-HCT between 2013 and 2020. Patients who had a diagnosis of cGVHD requiring systemic therapy and were alive in December 2020, (when the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine became available), were included in the analysis. The clinical data was queried from the bone marrow transplant (BMT) database, and medical records were individually reviewed for documentation of SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccination. Patients meeting criteria were screened in clinic for symptoms post-vaccination. We define worsening or flare of disease as an organ upstage of at least 1 by NIH Consensus Criteria scale, in addition to requirement of intervention with a systemic or topical therapy. All patients were consented under a University of Utah IRB-approved protocol for participation in this study. RESULTS: A total of 52 patients at our institution met the inclusion criteria of being alive with cGVHD at the time Covid mRNA vaccinations became available. Of these 52 patients, 65.4% (n=34) had had two doses of SARS-CoV-2 vaccine. Of these 34 patients, 26.5% (n=9) experienced worsening of their cGVHD manifestations after vaccination. All 9 of these patients (100%) received the Pfizer vaccine. Mean time between transplant day 0 and flare date was 1,222 days (95% CI 511-1,933). At the time of flare, 3/9 patients were on systemic treatment for cGVHD, 6/9 patients had been tapered off systemic therapy, and half of them were on topical therapies. Three patients (33.3%) experienced GVHD flare after SARS-CoV-2 vaccine dose #1. The remaining 6 (66.7%) experienced flare after dose #2, with a median time to flare of 1.5 days. Five of the 9 patients (55.6%) required systemic steroid therapy, with 2 patients (22.2%) requiring >30 days of treatment. The most common organs involved were skin and eyes. Six patients (66.7%) had resolution of flare symptoms. One patient (11.1%) subsequently developed Covid pneumonia and had relapse of AML. CONCLUSION: Though reports have emerged highlighting hematologic and other autoimmune disease recrudescence in response to SARS-CoV-2 vaccination, to our knowledge this is the first large case series demonstrating chronic GVHD flare in response to the vaccine. Almost a third of our cGVHD patients experienced disease flare shortly after vaccination, which raises questions of the degree and mechanism of such heightened immunogenicity in an mRNA vaccine. Consistent with prior studies, most of our patients (66.7%) experienced disease flare after receiving the 2 nd mRNA vaccine dose, Although correlation with vaccine administration does not necessary prove causation of GVHD flare, in counseling patients, the possibility of a severe flare should be weighed against risk of Covid infection. [Formula presented] Disclosures: Lee: Jazz,: Consultancy;Fresensius Kabi: Consultancy;Kite: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees;Kadmon: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees;CareDx: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committ es;Incyte: Research Funding.
ABSTRACT
Objectives: Compared with the general population, patients after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) are at higher risk to develop severe disease or die from COVID-19. Immunosuppressive therapy and graft-vs-host disease (GVHD) may abrogate the ability of transplanted patients to mount an adequate immune response to vaccines. We assessed the immune response of patients after allogeneic HCT to the BNT162b2 vaccine (Pfizer-BioNTech) and identified patient and treatment-related factors that predict humoral response in this population. Methods: We conducted an observational prospective cohort study at Rabin Medical Center, Israel. Adult patients after allogeneic HCT were eligible if they had no history of SARS-CoV-2 infection and received the 2-dose BNT162b2 vaccine. The SARS-CoV-2 IgG II Quant (Abbott©,) assay was performed 4-6 weeks after the second vaccine for quantitative measurement of IgG antibodies to spike protein (S-IgG) of SARS-CoV-2. The assay result was considered positive if S-IgG level was ≥50 AU/ml. We used the likelihood ratio of the ROC curves to define the optimal cut-off for continuous variables, χ2 to compare variables on categorical scale and Mann-Whitney to compare medians. To predict seronegativity, we applied logistic regression with the exp(β) as an estimator of hazard-ratio (HR) and the 95% confidence interval (CI) around it. To predict S-IgG levels, we used linear regression. Results: Our cohort included 106 patients. Median age was 65 (range: 23-80) years and 59% were males. Median time from transplant to vaccination was 42 (range: 4-439) months. At time of vaccination, 49% of patients were receiving immunosuppression, while 51% were not. Overall, 14% (15/106) tested negative for S-IgG after vaccination, 27% (14/52) of patients on immunosuppression compared with only 1.8% (1/54) of patients off immunosuppression (p=0.0002). Based on ROC analysis we divided the cohort into patients who were transplanted within (57%) vs. beyond (43%) 4.5y (AUC 0.77, CI: 0.66-0.88). With this cut-off, the sensitivity was 0.93. In univariate analysis, patients vaccinated within 4.5y of HCT (HR: 13.7, 95% CI 1.8-108.5, p=0.013), or still receiving immunosuppression (HR: 9.8, 95% CI 2.1-44.7, p=0.004) and patients with moderate to severe chronic GVHD (HR: 5.9, 95% CI 1.2-29, p=0.03) were more likely to remain seronegative. Age, gender, type of disease and absolute-lymphocyte-count did not predict seronegativity. In MVA, only time, i.e. <4.5y from HCT remained predictive (HR: 10.8, 95% CI 1.2-93.2, p=0.03) (Table 2). Since 93% (14/15) of seronegative patients were transplanted <4.5y, we performed a subgroup analysis of the 57% (60/106) of patients that were transplanted within this time frame. Among these, patients receiving immunosuppression (65%, 39/60) were more likely to remain seronegative (HR: 10, 95% CI: 1.1-93, p=0.03);36% (14/39) of patients on immunosuppression remained seronegative compared with none of the patients off immunosuppression (p=0.002). Among the 43% (46/106) of patients who were vaccinated >4.5y after HCT, 33% (15/46) were still receiving immunosuppression. Yet only 6.6% (1/15) in this subgroup tested negative. Titer levels in seropositive patients ranged between 60 and 80,000 AU/ml (median: 5319). Only a small fraction of this variance is explained by variables tested in this study. Older age (r 2=0.04, p=0.04), shorter time from transplantation (r 2=0.03, p=0.09), the use of corticosteroids (r 2=0.03, p=0.07) or calcineurin inhibitors (r 2=0.06, p=0.013) predicted lower S-IgG levels. The vaccine was well tolerated by most patients. No new cases of GVHD have been reported following vaccination. However, seven patients with chronic GVHD (mild=2;moderate=1;severe=4) reported that GVHD -related symptoms worsened within days following the first, second or both vaccines. Notably, one patient with chronic GVHD developed grade 4 steroid-refractory immune thrombocytopenia 2 weeks after the first vaccine. Conclusion: Overall, 14% of allogeneic HCT recipients had an inadequate ntibody response to the BNT162b2 vaccine. It was only 6.5% among patients off immunosuppression and patients vaccinated >4.5y after HCT. However, inadequate antibody response rate was 36% among recipients vaccinated <4.5y from HCT who were still receiving immunosuppression. These patients should be recognised and instructed to take appropriate precautions. [Formula presented] Disclosures: Yeshurun: Astellas: Consultancy;Jannsen: Consultancy. Wolach: Janssen: Consultancy;Abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding;Astellas: Consultancy;Amgen: Research Funding;Novartis: Consultancy;Neopharm: Consultancy.
ABSTRACT
The introduction of post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy) has circumvented the need for T-cell depletion following haploidentical stem cell transplantation (SCT). By expanding the donor pool for patients from certain ethnic minorities, this has addressed to some degree an important health care disparity issue in SCT. However, a recent registry study showed increased incidence GvHD and inferior outcomes in patients receiving haploidentical SCT with PTCy, tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil for GvHD prevention as opposed to matched unrelated donor SCT with PTCy-based GvHD prevention. Seeking to improve the results of GvHD prevention in the setting of haploidentical SCT, we examined a combination of PTCy, abatacept and a short course of tacrolimus (CAST). Abatacept is a recombinant soluble fusion protein composed of the extracellular domain of cytotoxic T-lymphocyte associated antigen-4 (CTLA-4) fused to the Fc region of IgG1. Abatacept blocks CD28-CD80I86 axis and prevents T-cell co-stimulation. In early studies, abatacept has shown promising results when added to methotrexate and tacrolimus in matched and mismatched donor SCT. We initiated a phase Ib-II clinical trial for patients with hematological malignancies undergoing haploidentical SCT. Patients received G-CSF mobilized peripheral blood grafts from related haploidentical donors. GvHD prevention consisted of PTCy 50mg/kg IV on day +3 and +4 with forced hydration, abatacept 10mg/kg IV on day +5, +14 and +28 and tacrolimus. Tacrolimus was started on day +5 at 0.02mg/kg/day by continuous IV and adjusted thereafter to maintain a trough level of 5-12ng/mL. Tacrolimus taper was planned to begin on day +60 and complete by day +90 in the absence of GvHD. All patients received standard supportive care including levofloxacin until neutrophil engraftment, posaconazole until day +75, acyclovir for 1 year and, if CMV positive by serology, letermovir until day +100. Pneumocystis Jiroveci prophylaxis was started after neutrophil engraftment and continued until 6 months post-transplant. G-CSF was administered routinely until neutrophil engraftment. Since September 2020, 19 patients were enrolled. Three patients are too early in their post-transplant course and were excluded from this analysis. Patients' characteristics are summarized in the table. All but 2 patients received cryopreserved products. Median times to ANC and platelet engraftment were 18.5 days (14-30) and 28.5 (16-61). All 16 patients achieved full whole blood donor chimerism by day +30. There was no secondary graft failure. With a median follow-up was 149.5 days (41-308) with 10 patients having >120 days and 8 >180 days of follow-up, 4 patients developed skin acute GvHD (all grade I). No patient developed grade II-IV acute GvHD. Two patients developed skin chronic GvHD (limited, both moderate). Both cases were diagnosed following COVID-19 vaccination. Fifteen patients completed tacrolimus taper by day +90. Two patients received systemic steroids, one for treatment of cGvHD. The remaining patients required no further immunosuppressive therapy beyond day +90. CMV activation rate was 25%. One patient had EBV reactivation and required preemptive therapy with 2 weekly rituximab doses. There were no cases of adenovirus, HHV-6 virus or BK virus reactivation. Four patients developed renal insufficiency (3 in the setting of acute sepsis and 1 with thrombotic microangiopathy, which resolved after tapering off tacrolimus. One patient with adult T-cell leukemia/lymphoma relapsed and died. All other patients are alive and well. In summary, our preliminary results suggest that CAST with shortened course of tacrolimus is feasible and seems to offer very promising outcomes with low rates of acute GvHD. The study is accruing actively and the results of a larger cohort with longer follow-up will be presented at the meeting. If confirmed, by improving the outcomes of haploidentical SCT, this regimen may further address a health care disparity issue, offering almost every patient in need of allogeneic SCT an alternative donor op ion with equal outcomes. [Formula presented] Disclosures: Al-Homsi: Daichii Sanyko: Consultancy;Celyad: Other: Advisory Board. Abdul-Hay: Abbvie: Consultancy;Servier: Other: Advisory Board, Speakers Bureau;Jazz: Other: Advisory Board, Speakers Bureau;Takeda: Speakers Bureau;Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. OffLabel Disclosure: Abatacept - off label use as GvHD prevention Cyclophosphamide - off label use as GvHD prevention